Google Relents, Restores Classic Google Images Interface
Someone at Google must be a little sad right about now. This guy decided to take the initiative and update the interface for Google Images a little bit, adding some stuff while retaining the same general look, and he got a very public smackdown from the community (I’m looking at you, mirror). So, after a very negative reception from users, Google has undone all that coder’s hard work, and we are left right back where we started, with the original Google Images interface.
Which is all just a roundabout way of saying that Google has brought back Google Images to the way it used to be, complete with text expanding on all the images. The redesign had removed all the text, save a snippet supposed to inform about the picture, with the rest of the info showing up if you rolled your mouse over, an inefficient method to say the least. In restoring the old version, Google has made one change: They now show only the website the image appears on, not the entire URL of the image.
I also discovered something strange and interesting about Google Images: If you resize your browser, Google reloads (AJAX-style) all the images on the page, reordering them to fit your new browser window. Google aqpparently wants the images to make a perfect grid, even to the point of showing less images per page on larger browser windows!
Take a look:
18 images, three rows of six, running full screen:
20 images, four rows of five:
20 images, five rows of four:
18 images, six rows of three:
21 images, three rows of seven (by setting browser zoom to 85%):
So, Google Images always shows between 18 and 21 images, based on the width of your browser. It doesn’t seem to care about the height. When you resize the page, all the images reload, because it isn’t the browser handling the resizing, it is Google Images. The page doesn’t reload, just the images, some good (and extremely subtle) use of AJAX.
Oddly enough, if you run Google Images large enough to get six images across, you are actually seeing less images on the page than you would with a smaller browser! It might be a good idea, if it is available to you, to run Images in a zoomed mode or smaller browser, just to get more per page. Interesting stuff.
By the way, if you are the Googler who did the redesign, don’t feel bad. Your heart was in the right place, your code pure. Next time, a shower of roses shall await you at your cubicle.
February 27th, 2007 at 9:54 pm
Welcome back, Google Images. I missed thee.
Too bad scrolling while being zoomed out/in is a bit sluggish in IE7. But I like the page width adjustment.
Now there’s still a lot left that can be improved - I have no idea why they changed the links for a drop down box, adding one click to the process. I’d also like them to change the three image sizes back to six or something, that way I wouldn’t have to change the URL anymore.
I’d also like to see 100 images per page. Google has YouTube and Google Video now, and both of them are probably steadily eating bandwidth. Now, why can’t we have 100 images per page, after all, that’s my setting for the regular Google search.
And I’d also love to have an advanced image search. Yeah, I know Google claims to have it, but it’s not really all that advanced. I have looked for image search engines that allow me to look for images having specific dimensions of MY choosing, but have come up with nothing so far.