AdSense Terms Altered
According to a blog called Google Operating System :
AdSense silently adds a 90-day time limit on AdSense referrals. A thread over at DigitalPoint points out that Google AdSense has quietly added a new term to all AdSense referrals generated by a publisher. They have now instituted a 90-day time limit on that referral, meaning a referred publisher must earn the $100 within the first 90 days, before the referring publisher is eligible to earn that $100 for a completed AdSense referral.
Google uses the asterisk trick at the bottom of the Referrals page.
The blog then links to this page which contains part of a screenshot. No date, no URL. I went to find out myself, but couldn’t locate the page or any similar notifications. Any help?
The screenshot says : ” * An AdSense referral is counted when a publisher, who has never previously enrolled in AdSense, creates an account and earns at least $100.00 within 90 days of sign-up. The referred publisher must be eligible for payment to qualify as a successful referral. ”
Google has an update message up on the AdSense files that says they have made revisions to this agreement in the following sections: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15 of the Google AdSense terms.



I can confirm that, i find the text inside my Google account too (under referrals)…
Comment by BloggingTom | January 28, 2006
The page where you can find the message is https://www.google.com/adsense/referrals-settings (you need to login to AdSense).
It’s strange that you can’t find other pages from AdSense help that contain this clause.
Comment by Ionut Alex. Chitu | January 28, 2006
[…] I always thought you guys would stand up for the freedom of speech and thoughts. You were the true example of a search engine that said things as they were. I’ve always been very pleased with the completeness of the information I got. I really thought this could last forever as the internet grew bigger, day after day. Apparently I was wrong. I appreciated it a lot you didn’t want to give in to the U.S. government like other companies have, in order to protect your users. Not that I have anything to hide, but because I thought it was just the right thing to do. Because I agreed that no government has the right to interfere with ’search’ in general. I was proud to be part of a Google community that stood up for its users. And now you’ve done the complete opposite of what you’ve always promised to do. These last days, information about your growing sneakyness and compliance to governments worldwide, in particular the Chinese, are piling up. What’s up with that? Where did you go wrong? […]
Pingback by Coolz0r - Marketing Thoughts » Dear Google | January 29, 2006
I read it at Philipp’s blog, I assume it’s true…
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-01-28-n18.html
Comment by Bálint | January 30, 2006
[…] More @ Blognews […]
Pingback by .:: Bloggerdelight ::. Your guide for interesting stuff! » AdSense Terms Altered | February 2, 2006