What Congress Said To Google
Here are some excerpts from articles about Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Cisco at the U.S. House of Representatives today.
Rep. Tom Lantos, ranking Democrat on the International Relations Committee, told the company officials that they had amassed great wealth and influence “but apparently very little social responsibility.”
“Your abhorrent actions in China are a disgrace,” Lantos said at the hearing. “I simply don’t understand how your corporate leadership sleeps at night.”
Rep. Chris Smith said the companies are “enabling dictatorship.”
“Cooperation with tyranny should not be embraced for the sake of profits,” said Smith, the Republican chairman of the House subcommittee on global human rights.
CNET:
Rep. Tom Lantos: Can you say in English that you’re ashamed of what your company and what the other companies have done?
Google: Congressman, I actually can’t, I don’t think it’s fair for us to say that we’re ashamed.
…
Lantos, to Microsoft: Is your company ashamed?
Microsoft: We comply with legally binding orders whether it’s here in the U.S. or China.
Lantos: Well, IBM complied with legal orders when they cooperated with Nazi Germany. Those were legal orders under the Nazi German system…Do you think that IBM during that period had something to be ashamed of?
Microsoft: I can’t speak to that. I’m not familiar in detail with IBM’s activities in that period.
…
Lantos, to Yahoo: Are you ashamed?
Yahoo: We are very distressed about the consequences of having to comply with Chinese law…We are certainly troubled by that and we look forward to working with our peers.
Lantos: Do you think that individuals or families have been negatively impacted by some of the activities we have been told, like being in prison for 10 years? Have any of the companies reached out to these families and asked if you could be of any help to them?
Yahoo: We have expressed our condemnation of the prosecution of this person, expressed our views to the Chinese government…We have approached the Chinese government on these issues.
Lantos: Have you reached out to the family? I can ask it 10 more times if you refuse to answer it. You are under oath.
Yahoo: We have not reached out to the families.
Lawmakers were generally unmoved by this last argument. “If the secret police asked half a century ago where Anne Frank was hiding, would the correct answer be to hand over the information to comply with the local laws?” asked Rep. Chris Smith, the New Jersey Democrat and chair of the subcommittee on human rights.
Drawing parallels with IBM’s collaboration with Nazi Germany, Mr Smith said: “US technology companies today are engaged in a similar sickening collaboration, decapitating the voice of dissidents.” He added: “Women and men are going to the gulag and being tortured as a direct result of information handed over to Chinese officials.”
Google, the world’s most used search engine, breached its own “Don’t be Evil” policy stated at a 2004 stock offering, said Representative Christopher Smith, who heads the House Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations.
“It has become evil’s accomplice,” said Smith, a New Jersey Republican.



[…] Nathan Weinberg has posted some excellent excerpts form today’s congressional hearings with various IT companies regarding thier actions in China. Here are some highlights: […]
Pingback by michaelzimmer.org » Blog Archive » Congress v. IT Companies re: China | February 15, 2006
[…] I don’t know about you, but there seems to be a lot of ire directed at these companies without any kind of real policy options to help them fight for democracy. Congress wants the advancement of freedom in China, but without upsetting the precious balance of foreign policy - it seems too easy to tell Google, Yahoo, and others that they’re a disgrace and should be ashamed when I seem to see a total lack of government statements on the same subject. (Maybe I’m just missing them.) […]
Pingback by alwaysBETA » Knocking Down The Great Firewall | February 16, 2006
Thanks for this amalgamation. It would have helped to have a bit more contexts though. We were going to blog this but didn’t know the context of these excerpts.
Comment by Newscyclist | February 17, 2006
[…] What Congress Said To Google 四大公司在美國眾議院聽證會上對他們在幫助中國排除異見上作證詞 […]
Pingback by 網絡暴民 Jacky’s Blog » 20060218網摘 - Things you don’t want Google to find | March 12, 2006
[…] Orkut To Disclose User IP Details To Mumbai Police In Case Of Objectionable Content The Indian Express reports that Orkut has entered into an agreement with the Enforcement Directore arm of the Mumbai Police: as per DCP Enforcement Directorate Sanjay Mohite, Orkut will share IP details of those who post “objectionable content” on Orkut and blogs. Apparently, all it will take is for DCP Mohite to send an email to Orkut. In a separate story, IE also reports that the Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D) has asked the Supreme Court of India to expand the list of federal crimes to include cyber terrorism. As per the agency, “The rapidity … of adoption of new technologies and innovative … planning and execution of cross-border crimes by organised crime-terrorist nexus has outpaced the speed with which law enforcement agencies at the state level have been able to ‘modernise’” We know how ineffective and poorly executed the blocking of blogs last year was - the government may have blamed ISPs for poor execution, but several of the sites on that list weren’t even relevant. How does the Police define “Objectionable Content”? Policing content online is a monumental task, and this deal between Orkut and the Mumbai Police is reminiscient of China. This post though dated, quotes discussions between U.S. House of Representatives and Google, Microsoft and Cisco: it’s an interesting read. […]
Pingback by Orkut To Disclose User IP Details To Mumbai Police In Case Of Objectionable Content « butterfly effect | March 12, 2007